|
|
Post by huneychild on Feb 2, 2009 11:42:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Ashton on Feb 2, 2009 11:54:36 GMT -5
I think the person that answered the question is an idiot. There's so many things wrong with it, I don't even know where to begin.
I don't know about a move; does anybody even watch ECW? But I'd much prefer it over him being cut.
|
|
|
|
Post by huneychild on Feb 2, 2009 11:59:08 GMT -5
I'm definitely with you on that, Ashton.
I believe that this person needs to see JBL on television and he will know what a stale act is. He'll also know that by watching John Cena, Kane, Triple H and the Undertaker.
I would probably prefer an ECW move over him being cut myself. I think I may not even watch RAW as much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Monster on Feb 2, 2009 14:11:03 GMT -5
I think the person that answered the question is an idiot. There's so many things wrong with it, I don't even know where to begin. I don't know about a move; does anybody even watch ECW? But I'd much prefer it over him being cut. i dont watch ECW. hell on the games i dont even use their characters. it would be odd to see william there. most of the guys on there are high flyers. |
|
|
|
Post by lindsay on Feb 2, 2009 17:37:56 GMT -5
Undoubtedly, Regal could teach the guys on ECW a few things, much as Finlay already does. (and a Finlay/Regal feud would be worth watching.)
I disagree that Regal's act is worn at this point though. I don't think WWE is using him properly -- that's the problem. Regal plays the part he's told to play, and if that sucks, then there is only so much he can do. Oscar-winning performers suck when they're given bad parts to play.
Think back to his final days as GM. Regal drew massive heel heat from audiences. Think about the last televised match with Punk-- it unanimously drew praise as the best match of the week. Regal still has it in him. If going to ECW would give him a better shot at a good part, then I would be for it. He's drowning in the testosterone on Raw.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ashton on Feb 2, 2009 17:44:33 GMT -5
Undoubtedly, Regal could teach the guys on ECW a few things, much as Finlay already does. (and a Finlay/Regal feud would be worth watching.) I disagree that Regal's act is worn at this point though. I don't think WWE is using him properly -- that's the problem. Regal plays the part he's told to play, and if that sucks, then there is only so much he can do. Oscar-winning performers suck when they're given bad parts to play. Iagree 100%! |
|
|
|
Post by huneychild on Feb 2, 2009 18:43:56 GMT -5
This just goes to show that Vince wants to push these no talent, jacked up guys who can't wrestle worth a crap. Obviously, the idiot that answered this question is in that same league.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ashton on Feb 2, 2009 19:26:07 GMT -5
This just goes to show that Vince wants to push these no talent, jacked up guys who can't wrestle worth a crap. Obviously, the idiot that answered this question is in that same league. Oh snap! Take that, PWInsider Q&A motherfuckers! |
|
|
|
Post by Monster on Feb 2, 2009 21:41:54 GMT -5
This just goes to show that Vince wants to push these no talent, jacked up guys who can't wrestle worth a crap. Obviously, the idiot that answered this question is in that same league. Oh snap! Take that, PWInsider Q&A motherfuckers! hells yeah! we should hold up a Q&A ourself man! with ours there would be no bullshit because we know more about wrestling than what ever 40 year old they put in front of the computer of the PWInsider. |
|
|
|
Post by enlglishlatinothug on Feb 2, 2009 23:50:00 GMT -5
There all wankers. regal should be in john bradshaw larfilled's place. we all know it.
|
|
|
|
Post by huneychild on Feb 2, 2009 23:53:19 GMT -5
There all wankers. regal should be in john bradshaw larfilled's place. we all know it. I will second that! |
|
|
|
Post by lindsay on Feb 3, 2009 16:15:17 GMT -5
There all wankers. regal should be in john bradshaw larfilled's place. we all know it. HaHaHa I nominate that for a quote  |
|
|
|
Post by enlglishlatinothug on Feb 6, 2009 17:11:22 GMT -5
Cheeres flowers
|
|
